Restricted Stock Awards: Changing Executive Compensation

Top executives often receive equity in the company as a large proportion of their total compensation. How corporations make those equity awards has changed significantly over the past decade. The use of Stock Options (SOs), where executives have the right to purchase company stock at a certain price after vesting, has dropped dramatically, often replaced with Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs), where, after vesting, ownership of the stock is automatically transferred to executives.

ERI Economic Research Institute has documented changes in top executive compensation since 1997, when RSAs comprised about 10% of the average top executive compensation, and SOs represented 43%. By the end of 2010, the picture was dramatically different. RSAs accounted for 31% of total compensation, while SOs were only 27%. There are some good reasons why RSAs are often a more attractive form of equity compensation for both employers and executives.

The Executive Perspective:

When companies issue SOs and business performance doesn't improve, executives have options that are worth nothing. Even if the stock price is higher than the award price, executives have to take action to realize a benefit. RSAs, on the other hand, are never underwater and, when vested, do retain value, even if the value is less than the stock price when awarded (unless theoretically the stock price goes below $0.00). Executives can have a more favorable effective tax rate once the RSA is vested by filing certain information with the IRS and the employer within 30 days of the grant. (See http://www.fairmark.com/execcomp/sec83b.htm for more information on this Section 83(b) election.)

The Employer Perspective:

Equity compensation is intended to motivate executives to stay with the company and make decisions from an owner's viewpoint. Since stock ownership transfers when RSAs vest, that ownership happens automatically. The executive doesn't have to take action, as they do with SOs. In addition, RSAs have a more favorable accounting treatment on the company's financial statements than SOs. RSAs also tend to be smaller in size than SOs, so there is less stock dilution.

Example:

An SO is granted at $20 per share but trades at $10 when the option vests. The stock option is worth $0.00. However, an RSA granted at $20 that trades at $10 when vested is still worth $10. The SO is underwater and has no value, while the RSA has retained 50% of its value.

del.icio.us Digg StumbleUpon Facebook Technorati Fav reddit MSN Live Google Bookmarks

Comments

No comments have been posted.

Leave a Comment

(will not be displayed)
(optional)
Leave this field empty:



Post Comment

Related Topics

Twitter Updates